Man unlawfully arrested by Kent Police receives damages for short arrest and intrusion into his home

Photo of a letter from Kent Police.

My client Richard is a 6 foot tall man, with a strong ‘northern’ accent.  Richard was involved in a serious road traffic accident many years ago and has a prosthetic leg.  He has various tattoos on his upper body but crucially on neither hand.

In or around 2021, Richard moved into Flat 2 of a shared house of five flats in a town in Kent.

In September/October 2023, Richard was asked by his landlord to move into Flat 4 in the same building, whilst renovation works were carried out.  At this time, Flat 4 had been vacant for a lengthy period of time. 

Late one evening in November 2023, Richard was in bed, dressed only in his boxer shorts (and with his prosthetic limb therefore entirely visible) when he was disturbed by a loud banging on the door of his flat. 

Concerned, Richard opened the door to be confronted by three Officers of Kent Police.  One of the Officers, PC White, asked Richard if he was “Kevin Butler”.  Richard of course replied that he was not.

It is now known that the Officers were looking for Kevin Butler so as to arrest him for failing to attend Court.  Mr Butler’s PNC (Police National Computer) record confirmed that he was 5ft 8 inches tall, with a London accent and distinctive tattoos on his left hand and right wrist – other than being white and male, Richard and Mr Butler shared no identifying characteristics – and, even more notably, Mr Butler had two legs. 

Nevertheless, PC White now stepped into Richard’s flat, seized hold of my client’s right wrist and told him “You are under arrest for failing to appear”.  PC White applied a handcuff to Richard’s right wrist, causing him discomfort.

Richard immediately challenged this misidentification and told the Officers his name.

Another Officer now commented “We will sort it out in a minute, we think you look very much like him (i.e. Mr Butler) and you’ve got a lot of tatts so we will be able to sort it out”. Richard did have tattoos on his body, but not on his hands.

Richard pointed out that he only had one leg and queried if Mr Butler also only had one leg.  All three Officers confirmed that they had not noted that particular detail on Mr Butler’s PNC record – which undoubtedly they would have done, had it been there. 

With realisation perhaps beginning to dawn, the Officers removed the handcuff from Richard and allowed him to produce ID in the form of his bank card.  Richard told the Officers that they had “scared the life” out of him. 

PC White then left Richard’s flat for several minutes to check the Police National Database, during which time Richard remained, in effect under (wrongful) arrest. 

When PC White returned, Richard had to allow his hands and wrists to be checked, to confirm that he did not bear the tattoos which Mr Butler did in those places, whereupon the Officers advised Richard “We will mark it up and hopefully we won’t bother you again”.  As the Officers left the flat one of them flippantly remarked “Your disability has done you a favour tonight”.

Richard was understandably left shaken and upset by these events, struggled to return to sleep that night and suffered with worry and anxiety for several weeks afterwards.

Although the whole incident had not lasted more than 16 minutes, it was a gross and disturbing intrusion into Richard’s home and life and the effects of it lingered for much longer than that.

Richard was subject to wrongful arrest and detention without the least justification in his home.  It was all the harder for him to bear because a modicum of common sense would have excluded him from all reasonable suspicion.  His arrest was therefore a perfect example of high handed, arbitrary and egregiously thoughtless use of Police power.  I submitted a letter of claim on behalf of Richard and anticipated a full admission of liability and offer of settlement.  Kent Police disagreed with my assessment and denied liability asserting that the Officers had acted lawfully.  I was forced to issue proceedings after which I am pleased to say that Kent Police admitted liability. Following negotiation, Kent Police agreed to pay Richard £3,000 damages together with his legal fees.

My client’s name, and the name of the wanted man, have been changed.