I have previously blogged about the misconduct proceedings brought against two West Midlands Police Officers due to commence today, 26 October.
To recap, my client Alex Faragher called West Midlands Police to lodge a complaint of domestic violence. The Officers assigned to her case, subsequently called her mobile to discuss the allegation. When the call went to answer phone, they inadvertently left an expletive ridden voice mail.
In the voice mail, you can hear these two men calling this victim of domestic violence a “f….. bitch” & a “f….. slag” before suggesting that they “go back, f.…… draft the statement out ourselves and then just get the bitch to sign it”.
Ms Faragher lodged a complaint about the voice mail and the Officers’ subsequent behaviour at the Police station as regards the preparation of her statement of evidence.
Police Misconduct Hearing
I am pleased to report that at a public hearing today, and despite the best efforts of the force’s Professional Standards Department during the course of the investigation to dilute the misconduct so that it related to the indisputable voice mail only, the Officers admitted all allegations of misconduct, i.e. in relation to the voice mail and conduct at the Police Station.
Apparently recognising the seriousness of the situation, one of the officers, PC Guest, repeatedly apologized, according to today’s newspaper reports.
Gross Misconduct in Police Matters
The issue for the tribunal (made up of two senior police officers and an independent lay person) to now decide is whether the Officers’ conduct amounts to just misconduct or whether their behaviour is so serious as to qualify for gross misconduct. So, what’s the difference?
Misconduct is defined as “a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour”.
Gross Misconduct is defined as “a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour that is so serious as to justify dismissal”.
This is not very helpful.
But, when you recognize that this an employment matter at its heart, things become clearer.
Gross misconduct in that context is either deliberate wrongdoing or gross negligence by the employee (police officer) which is so serious that it fundamentally undermines the relationship of trust and confidence between the employee and employer (Chief Constable).
Today, barristers employed by both officers made representations to the panel that the admitted misconduct was simply that, misconduct. The problem for the Officers is that:
- the eyes of the world (given that the hearing is in public) are upon them, and
- in my opinion, the behaviour (as captured on voice mail) is so extreme that it has brought the force into disrepute.
A finding of gross misconduct and dismissal without further notice must be the only possible sanction.
We should know tomorrow.
Read my blog for more insights into matters involving the police.